<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>War on SummaryShelf</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/tags/war/</link><description>Recent content in War on SummaryShelf</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://summaryshelf.app/tags/war/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Art of War</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/art-of-war/</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/art-of-war/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The best general wins before the first blow lands. Writing more than 2,500 years ago during China&amp;rsquo;s era of warring states, Sun Tzu argued that battles are largely decided in advance — by the commander who reads terrain, morale, timing, and the opponent so accurately that a rival can be maneuvered into yielding. Actual fighting is the expensive last resort. &amp;ldquo;The best thing of all is to take the enemy&amp;rsquo;s country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good.&amp;rdquo; The highest skill is to win without fighting at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/guns-germs-and-steel/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/guns-germs-and-steel/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Why did some societies end up conquering others with guns, germs, and steel, instead of the other way around? The tempting answer, that one people was simply cleverer or more capable, is the one Diamond spends the whole book demolishing. His argument is that the differences between human societies were shaped by environment, not biology. The peoples of Eurasia—Asia, Europe, and North Africa—came to dominate not because of anything innate in them, but because their continent happened to hand them a set of incidental advantages that compounded over thousands of years into advanced knowledge, centralized states, and resistance to disease. Change the geography and you change the whole outcome.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Hundred Years' War on Palestine</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/hundred-years-war-on-palestine/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/hundred-years-war-on-palestine/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In 1899, Yusuf Diya al-Khalidi, the mayor of Jerusalem, sent a letter warning that the Zionist movement&amp;rsquo;s plan for a Jewish national home in Palestine would meet resistance from the people already living there. He closed with a plea: &amp;ldquo;in the name of God, let Palestine be left alone.&amp;rdquo; The author of this book is his great-great-nephew, and he uses that unheeded warning to open a century-long history. Rashid Khalidi&amp;rsquo;s central claim is that what followed was not a symmetrical clash of two national movements but a settler-colonial project — sponsored first by Britain and later by the United States, in which Palestinians were denied political recognition at every turn. Under Ottoman rule, Arabs made up 94% of Palestine&amp;rsquo;s population; Khalidi traces how that majority lost its standing, drawing throughout on his own family&amp;rsquo;s documents and experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Israel: A Concise History of a Nation Reborn</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/israel/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/israel/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Israel&amp;rsquo;s whole history turns on a single, painful double fact: the state exists because persecution in Europe had made Jewish safety impossible anywhere else, and it was built on land where other people already lived. Hold those two truths together and much of what followed stops looking like a puzzle. A nation founded to end Jewish vulnerability has been at war almost continuously since its birth, and it flourishes and is contested at the very same time. Daniel Gordis traces how that tension was baked in from the start.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Prince</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/prince/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/prince/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Machiavelli wants to tell you how power actually works, not how moralists wish it worked. Plenty of writers have imagined republics and princes that never existed. He wants the real truth of it, and the real truth is uncomfortable: how people actually live is so far from how they ought to live that a ruler who insists on being good in every situation, surrounded by people who are not, will ruin himself. So a prince has to learn how not to be good, and to use that knowledge or withhold it depending on what the moment demands. Holding a state you inherited is easy enough; you mostly just avoid breaking with your ancestors&amp;rsquo; customs. The hard case, the one this book circles, is the new prince building authority from nothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>