<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Jim Collins on SummaryShelf</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/authors/jim-collins/</link><description>Recent content in Jim Collins on SummaryShelf</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://summaryshelf.app/authors/jim-collins/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others Don't</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/good-to-great/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/good-to-great/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Good is the enemy of great. Collins opens with that line and means it as a diagnosis: we have so few great schools, great governments, and great lives precisely because good ones are comfortable enough to settle for. The same trap catches companies. To find out how a few of them escaped it, Collins and his team spent five years studying firms that made a durable leap, ones whose stock returns averaged 6.9 times the market over fifteen years, and matched each against a direct competitor with similar resources that stayed merely good. What separated them wasn&amp;rsquo;t brilliant strategy or a visionary at the helm. It was a specific, mostly unglamorous sequence of choices.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>