<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>David Epstein on SummaryShelf</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/authors/david-epstein/</link><description>Recent content in David Epstein on SummaryShelf</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://summaryshelf.app/authors/david-epstein/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/range/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/range/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Roger Federer and Tiger Woods both reached the summit of their sports, but they climbed by opposite routes. Tiger was swinging a club before he could talk, guided by a father who had already mapped out his destiny. Roger played squash, skiing, wrestling, basketball, handball, table tennis, and soccer, and only drifted toward tennis as a teenager, after &amp;ldquo;pully&amp;rdquo; parents kept nudging him to stop taking it so seriously. We repeat the Tiger story endlessly, with its ten-thousand-hours rule and its earlier-is-better head start, and almost never tell Roger&amp;rsquo;s, even though his path is the far more common one. David Epstein&amp;rsquo;s argument is that in most of the domains that actually matter, breadth beats early hyperspecialization. The people who sample widely, think by analogy, and specialize late develop the range that lets them solve problems no specialist saw coming.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>