<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bryan Burrough on SummaryShelf</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/authors/bryan-burrough/</link><description>Recent content in Bryan Burrough on SummaryShelf</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://summaryshelf.app/authors/bryan-burrough/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Barbarians at the Gate: The Fall of RJR Nabisco</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/barbarians-at-the-gate/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/barbarians-at-the-gate/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The RJR Nabisco takeover was not a crime, and that is what makes it useful. In Bryan Burrough and John Helyar&amp;rsquo;s account nobody breaks a law. The chief executive, the buyout firms, the investment banks and the directors all behave rationally given what each personally stood to gain — and the company still ends up sold at a record price paid with borrowed money, its chief executive gone, its new owners holding a deal they would later say they would not repeat. The argument underneath the storytelling is structural. When the people making a decision are paid on a different basis from the people who own the asset, the decision stops being about the asset.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>