<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Barry Schwartz on SummaryShelf</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/authors/barry-schwartz/</link><description>Recent content in Barry Schwartz on SummaryShelf</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://summaryshelf.app/authors/barry-schwartz/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/paradox-of-choice/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/paradox-of-choice/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Barry Schwartz walked into the Gap for a pair of jeans and got a question back: slim fit, easy fit, relaxed fit, baggy, or extra baggy? Stonewashed, acid-washed, or distressed? Button-fly or zipper? He carried one of each into the dressing room and finally picked easy fit, because &amp;ldquo;relaxed&amp;rdquo; sounded like an admission he was going soft in the middle. The jeans fit better than any he had owned. Buying them had also eaten most of a day and come with a side of dread. That gap — better result, worse experience — is the argument. Some choice is essential. More choice is not automatically better. Past a certain point, added options stop liberating you and start grinding you down.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>