<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Annie Duke on SummaryShelf</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/authors/annie-duke/</link><description>Recent content in Annie Duke on SummaryShelf</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://summaryshelf.app/authors/annie-duke/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/thinking-in-bets/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/thinking-in-bets/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Twenty-six seconds left in Super Bowl XLIX, second down on the one-yard line, and Seattle&amp;rsquo;s Pete Carroll called a pass instead of handing to Marshawn Lynch. It was intercepted; &lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt; called it the worst play call in NFL history. Yet none of the sixty-six passes thrown from an opponent&amp;rsquo;s one-yard line that season had been intercepted, and the fifteen-year rate was 2 percent. A defensible call, a disastrous result. Poker players have a name for what his critics did: resulting — grading a decision by how it turned out. Two things decide how a life goes, decision quality and luck, and most of our errors come from refusing to separate them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>