<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Amir Levine and Rachel Heller on SummaryShelf</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/authors/amir-levine-and-rachel-heller/</link><description>Recent content in Amir Levine and Rachel Heller on SummaryShelf</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://summaryshelf.app/authors/amir-levine-and-rachel-heller/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Attached</title><link>https://summaryshelf.app/attached/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://summaryshelf.app/attached/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Your love life probably isn&amp;rsquo;t as unpredictable as it feels. According to Amir Levine and Rachel Heller, most romantic patterns follow a script set by attachment style—the wired way you handle closeness—and there are only three main scripts. Roughly half of adults are secure: comfortable with intimacy, steady when a partner needs space. About 20 percent are anxious: hungry for closeness but forever scanning for signs of abandonment. Around 25 percent are avoidant: they read intimacy as a threat to independence and keep partners at arm&amp;rsquo;s length. The single most common source of romantic misery is the collision between the last two, where one person&amp;rsquo;s reach for connection sets off the other&amp;rsquo;s retreat, again and again.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>